Tag Archives: medical negligence compensation

Patient Receives Medical Negligence Compensation After Her Surgery Is Cancelled

A hospital has been instructed to render £10,000 in medical negligence compensation to a sixty three year old patient, who had to have their surgical procedure cancelled, due to a mix-up within the operating room. The elderly woman reported in an interview that she was absolutely disgusted over the care that she was given from the doctors at the facility that she was supposed to have her hip surgery performed at. The elderly woman stated that she felt that the doctors had no respect for her well-being, instead, they treated her like she was a piece of meat, laying across a conveyor belt.

2450542_s

Why Would A Patient Feel Inadequate When Having A Surgical Procedure Performed?

The patient in question, had been scheduled to have her right hip replaced, after she had been suffering in excruciating pain for over the course of a year. Prior to the procedure being rendered, the woman had already had two sets of blood tests performed, and an assessment of her condition. She believed that everything was going to plan, when she was wheeled into the operating room.

But, a few moments before the procedure was set to go underway, a nurse realised that the proper blood supplies were not on hand for the procedure. The patient had underwent two separate blood draws in order to ensure that these supplies were going to be readily available, if they were required during the operation.

The patient had already been given a pain killer, shortly before the nurse realised what had occurred. She was administered Oxycontin, and an anaesthetist was in the midst of preparing to administer additional medications to assist with the procedure. The patient, who was already dreading having the procedure performed, admits that the entire procedure was horrendous.

She recalls laying on the operating table, shaking from the pain medication that she had just been given, and hearing a nurse yelling about the bloods not being readily available. The patient then heard the surgeon conversing with the nurse stating that they were going to perform the surgery anyway, without the bloods being readily available, if something adverse should occur during the procedure. It would take the bloods twelve hours to get to the facility, from where they were stored, so if something did occur, the patient’s life could be on the line.

Should The Surgeon Have Operated Without The Proper Bloods?

The surgeon was persistent that the job had to be done, but the anaesthetist stopped him before he was able to begin. Currently, the patient, now has endured a year of pain, due to her procedure being cancelled, and does not plan on returning to the same facility that could not get the job done the first time.

Source – https://www.medicalnegligenceassist.co.uk

Medical Negligence Compensation Awarded To 36 Year Old Lady

A successful, thirty six year old scientist, who suffered a brain injury, leaving her with permanent brain damage, was awarded medical negligence compensation for her suffering. The young and ambitious scientist, currently has to suffer with left brain damage, after she was forced to wait almost two hours for an ambulance to come to her aid. Although she has been compensated for her ailment, this does not reverse what has occurred.

24138854_s

In 2007, the young lady collapsed in her home. Her boyfriend, who was present at the time that the incident occurred, called emergency services to be dispatched to their residence. The scientists boyfriend reported to emergency services that the young lady was unconscious and her breathing was abnormal. The ladies lips started to turn blue.

However, instead of an ambulance immediately being dispatched to the ladies home, the emergency services identified the home that the incidence occurred in as being red-flagged. Therefore, the crew was forced to wait 100m away from the residence, until they could be given a police escort. Unfortunately, at the time that the incidence was occurring, there were no police officers that were available in the area.

The ambulance kept their distance from the residence, despite the fact that two additional 999 calls were made. The medical team, had no other choice but to wait, until the police could be present, allowing them to help the young scientist. By the time that the paramedics were able to reach the scientist, an immense amount of damage had already been done.

The thirty six year old intelligent young woman’s brain was starved of oxygen, which resulted in permanent brain damage. She also suffered with cardiac arrest for five minutes, prior to the ambulance arriving at her residence. Suffering from cardiac arrest, ended up leaving the young woman with confusion, chronic amnesia, along with disorientation. As a result of being forced to wait for emergency services, the young woman will never be able to engage in the working environment that she enjoyed.

She will require twenty four hours of care, for the remainder of her life. The ambulance crew that was dispatched to the young scientists home, offered their apologies for the delay. Due to the shortcomings of the emergency response team, the scientist will receive annual compensation. The mother of the young scientist is distraught by the

A woman, 86 years old and very frail with multiple health problems, had been living with her husband of 65 years in her son’s home in a town in Gloucestershire to convalesce after a short illness when she was admitted to the local hospital in March of last year for observation after she bruised her elbow. She was moved to a ward in the hospital that opens to accommodate more people during the winter but was not seen by a doctor until three days after her admittance.

The ward had been opened on quick notice due to increased demand but there were shortages of doctors and nurses and care was taken over by consultants. The ward was staffed by two qualified and two health care assistants but was funded for a level of three each. According to the nurse director, it was very difficult to keep up with staffing levels and so it was possible that knowledge of the woman and her condition were not known.
In addition, when the woman arrived, the procedures for care had yet been established and did not see a doctor until after she contracted Norovirus and pneumonia from the hospital. However, a staff member at the ward emphasized that someone was on the ward every day and there was a process in place but somehow that process was not followed with regard to the woman. Later she was transferred to another ward where her symptoms began to improve.

About three week later, her diarrhea returned and doctors determined that she was not likely to recover so they transferred her to a program that would effectively not resuscitate her. Often this is done without the patient’s knowledge and, consequently, the hospital no longer uses this program. The doctor who initially saw the woman felt that clearly something had gone wrong in the system. The woman never did recover and the family agreed to end of life care.

The solicitor representing the family has said that they are having a hard time coming to terms that she entered the hospital with a bruised elbow and died as a result of the chaos that seemed to be prevalent in the ward in which she had first been admitted. The family is looking into legal action against the hospital which has been working with the family over the past year to discuss their concerns, answer questions and determine how they can make improvements.

She stated that her daughter was ambitious and employed in a career that she enjoyed, now, due to the negligence of the emergency response team and police officers within the area, her daughter will never be able to live a normal life.

Source- https://www.medicalnegligenceassist.co.uk

Medical Negligence Compensation of £150,000 Awarded

In September 2008, an hour after a man went to work, he had a sudden, sharp cold pain in his foot as if he had stepped on an icicle. After walking only 200 yards, he would be in pain. As a result of negligence, he was awarded a large amount of medical negligence compensation when following his case up.

26127365_s

He saw his general practitioner who referred him for blood tests and prescribed painkillers. Two weeks later he went to the emergency department at a local hospital as his symptoms had gotten worse and he could not sleep. More painkillers were prescribed and he was told he would get better. There was no checking of his pulse in the main arteries of the leg which was a significant omission as the man suffered from severe ischemia, which is a lack of blood flow. This condition requires prompt treatment to remove the rotten dying flesh which results from the condition which can range from simple skin removal to amputation.

A month after his initial appointment and three more doctors’ appointments, he was referred to another hospital where a vascular surgeon diagnosed his condition as critical ischemia. He had angiogram, was sent home and a week later in October 2008 was told that two of the main arteries in his foot were blocked.

By December, the man’s toes were decaying and he had a mid-foot amputation. At the same time, his calf had also started to decay so in January 2009, his limb below the knee was completely amputated. Consequently, after five months, 15 doctors’ appointments, three hospital stays and three surgical procedures, the man could not walk without help for long periods of time, was unable to work and could not support his family.

The solicitors claimed that the doctors and surgeons breached their duty of care to the man as the diagnosis and treatment of his critical ischemia were delayed. It is probable that his lower left leg would not have been amputated. The solicitors also argued that the two doctors the man had seen were negligent in looking at test results and symptoms that the man’s tissue in his foot was dying and did not refer him to urgent hospital treatment despite his claims of distress and pain. The two Trusts also failed to properly diagnosis and treat the man so his pain and loss of limb could have been avoided.

Before the case went to trail, the defendants made an offer of £150,000 plus costs, which included £44,500 for damages and £105,000 for special damages, which now gives the man and his family sufficient funds to get the assistance and supports required for as long as it is needed.

Source- https://www.medicalnegligenceassist.co.uk